According to Article 124 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, the thirty-day period for review applies to which listed court?
Question and options
According to Article 124 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, the thirty-day period for review applies to which listed court?
Supreme Court only
High Court only
Both Supreme Court and High Court
Neither Supreme Court nor High Court
Answer and explanation
Article 124 prescribes thirty days from the date of the decree or order for an application for review of judgment "by a court other than the Supreme Court", so it covers a High Court but not the Supreme Court. A review petition in the Supreme Court is governed instead by Order XLVII rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, which also allows thirty days; that equal period comes from the Rules, not from Article 124, so neither the Supreme Court alone nor both courts is correct.
Practice for these exams
-
Chhattisgarh Judicial Services
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in The Schedule - periods for suits, appeals & applications
- The period of limitation for filing a suit relating to tort against one who, having right to use property for specific purpose, perverts it to other purpose is:
- Under Article 36 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, a promissory note is payable in instalments and has no term making the whole balance due on default.…
- What is the period of limitation for a mortgagor to redeem or recover possession of immovable property mortgaged and when does such period of limitation begin to…
- What limitation period does the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribe for a suit for which it provides no period elsewhere?
- Indian law as at 6 November 2026. Under Article 74 of the Limitation Act,1963, what is the period for a suit for compensation for malicious prosecution?